Abstract:
The present work deals with the phenomena of a company in economic and financial crisis, demonstrating that not always a single bar judgment will be effective in the judgment of a judicial recovery, given the procedural slowness that is a high problem for a company in such situation and access to justice for both the company in crisis and the creditors. Being the companies that drives the growth of a State, this innovated the legislation creating the judicial recovery and with it several mechanisms so that a company in crisis, but still has the viability to continue in the market, does not convict in bankruptcy so that it maintains the productive source and duly apply its social function by maintaining jobs and generating benefits for the society linked to it. Such mechanisms are not always easy to apply or interpret, so the specialized rod judge has a greater facility to apply them properly, since he is in contact with this peculiar legislation at all times. Thus, the judicial recovery law is analyzed, demonstrating such peculiarities that leave the application of this complex law. The paper also aims to demonstrate that judicial recovery is a mechanism used by the state to try to manage an internal crisis, enabling it to recover and become an income producer for society.
