Abstract:
With the arrival of the new Civil Procedure Code (CPC, 2015), there were also
thousands of doubts regarding various topics of the law portrayed. One of these
issues is in reference to atypical executive measures, typified in art. 139, item IV, of
the aforementioned law. For this reason, this article will address a deductive research
method on the need, proportionality, reasonableness and constitutionality of atypical
executive measures in today's Brazilian legal system, as well as, what these
measures are, and how they can help the judiciary in taking decisions. decisions
regarding debts resulting from pecuniary actions. If such measures in any way
infringe the fundamental rights and guarantees of the contemporary Brazilian citizen,
in the same way that, if there is any unconstitutional discretion of judges when making their decisions to the detriment of pecuniary debtors of a certain amount,
which analysis will be carried out -a throughout the legal journal.
