ESTUDO COMPARATIVO ENTRE PACIENTES DE PRÓTESES TOTAL CONVENCIONAL E PRÓTESES PROTOCOLO: Revisão De Literatura

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative analysis between conventional complete prostheses and protocol prostheses, focusing on the oral rehabilitation of edentulous patients. The aim is to examine how each type of prosthesis impacts quality of life, functionality, and stability, with a particular focus on patients with bone resorption. Based on a literature review, this research utilized articles from SciELO, PubMed, BVS, and Google Scholar, published between 2018 and 2024, selecting studies that directly address the characteristics of the prostheses under investigation. Results indicate that protocol prostheses, beingimplant-supported, provide greater stability, retention, and functional comfort, particularly in chewing and facial support, thus enhancing users' self-esteem. However, this type of prosthesis requires strict maintenance and hygiene routines to prevent complications, such as peri-implantitis, which can compromise osseointegration. In conclusion, protocol prostheses represent an advantageous and effective option for oral rehabilitation, especially for patients with significant bone loss, though they demand a commitment to daily care to ensure long-term success.