Abstract:
This study conducts a comparative analysis between conventional complete
prostheses and protocol prostheses, focusing on the oral rehabilitation of
edentulous patients. The aim is to examine how each type of prosthesis impacts
quality of life, functionality, and stability, with a particular focus on patients with
bone resorption. Based on a literature review, this research utilized articles from
SciELO, PubMed, BVS, and Google Scholar, published between 2018 and
2024, selecting studies that directly address the characteristics of the
prostheses under investigation. Results indicate that protocol prostheses, beingimplant-supported, provide greater stability, retention, and functional comfort,
particularly in chewing and facial support, thus enhancing users' self-esteem.
However, this type of prosthesis requires strict maintenance and hygiene
routines to prevent complications, such as peri-implantitis, which can
compromise osseointegration. In conclusion, protocol prostheses represent an
advantageous and effective option for oral rehabilitation, especially for patients
with significant bone loss, though they demand a commitment to daily care to
ensure long-term success.
