Abstract:
This research is part of the Postgraduate Program in Education – Academic Master’s
Degree at Centro Universitário Mais – UniMAIS, and is included in the Research Line
Education, Culture, Theories, and Pedagogical Processes. It is worth noting that the
general objective of this dissertation is to analyze what is established by the Brazilian
State regulations regarding distance learning undergraduate teaching degrees,
investigating the guidelines for the accreditation and offering of such courses, as well
as the requirements for technological infrastructure and the main criteria for teacher
education programs from a neoliberal perspective. Based on this analysis, the
following research problem was formulated: How has the Brazilian State adapted to the
implementation of distance education in the neoliberal context, especially in the
segment of undergraduate teaching degrees in higher education?The study adopts a
bibliographic and documentary research method, grounded in the paradigm of
historical-dialectical materialism. To this end, a systematic literature review was initially
carried out to revisit the main concepts established in this research. The selection of
the theoretical framework was based on physical literary works, but also included
research on online platforms such as Google Scholar, the Ministry of Education (MEC),
the CAPES Periodicals Portal, and university repositories of scientific studies. The
main authors who support this research include Laval (2019), Libâneo (2005), Moran
(2009), Saviani (2008), among others. It is concluded that, although Distance
Education represents a strategy to democratize access to higher education and
expand teacher training, its effectiveness depends on public policies that ensure
quality, equity, and alignment with social needs. The analysis of the regulations
showed significant advances but also revealed structural and pedagogical challenges
that need to be overcome, as well as the obstacles imposed by neoliberal logic, which
tends to commodify education, prioritize quantitative indicators to the detriment of
formative quality, and weaken the social commitment of teaching.