Abstract:
This research is part of the Graduate Program in Education, Academic Master's
degree, at Centro Universitário Mais – UniMAIS, and belongs to the Research Line –
Education, Culture, Theories, and Pedagogical Processes. The overall objective of this
dissertation is to analyze the guidelines for teaching literature in the final years of
elementary school as presented in the Goiás Curriculum Document (DCGO),
investigating its implications for the formation of readers and for the critical
development of students. To this end, the investigation was guided by the following
research question: in what way does the DCGO, in its dialogue with the National
Common Curricular Base (BNCC), prescribe the teaching of literature, and how does
this prescription position itself in the face of theoretical debates on literary literacy and
the formation of a critical reader? The methodology adopted was documentary and
bibliographic research, structured in three analytical stages. Firstly, a theoretical review
was conducted to establish the research foundations, addressing the historical path of
literature teaching in Brazil, the humanizing function of literature as consolidated in the
thought of Candido (2004), and the concept of literary literacy by Cosson (2006) as the
main category of analysis. Secondly, a documentary analysis of the DCGO was carried
out, in comparison with the BNCC, focusing on the skills matrix of the Artistic-Literary
Field. Finally, the research explored the paths of pedagogical praxis, discussing
dialogic methodologies, classroom challenges – including the pressure of external
evaluations – and the role of teacher autonomy. The results indicate that the DCGO
presents an ambivalent proposal: while it incorporates skills with the potential for
forming a critical reader, its structure also runs the risk of fostering a technicist and
fragmented practice, in addition to presenting a still incipient regional contextualization.
It is concluded that the implementation of an emancipatory literature teaching, based
on the document, will crucially depend on pedagogical praxis, that is, on the teacher's
ability, in their autonomy, to re-signify the curricular prescriptions and articulate them
into a pedagogical project that prioritizes the aesthetic experience and the integral
formation of the student.